Biblical references
Text: World English Bible (public domain). The ESV and NKJV are the preferred study translations and are referenced, not reproduced.
29 “He will return at the appointed time and come into the south; but it won’t be in the latter time as it was in the former. 30 For ships of Kittim will come against him. Therefore he will be grieved, and will return, and have indignation against the holy covenant, and will take action. He will even return, and have regard to those who forsake the holy covenant.
Proposed correlation only.
Biblical account
Layer: Biblical text
He returns to the south, but the latter time is not as the former, for ships of Kittim come against him; he is grieved and returns in indignation against the holy covenant.
Historical overview
Layer: Historical reconstruction · Period: Sixth Syrian War (170–168 BC)
Antiochus IV invaded Egypt in 170/169 and again in 168. Near Alexandria, at Eleusis, the Roman envoy Popillius Laenas handed him the Senate's decree, drew a circle round him and demanded an answer before he stepped out; Antiochus agreed to withdraw (Polybius 29.27). Driver: Kittim (Cyprus/western coastlands) here stands for the Roman envoys.[1, 2]
- Antiochus IV Epiphanes: Seleucid king[1]
- Gaius Popillius Laenas: Roman envoy[1]
- Ptolemy VI Philometor: Ptolemaic king[2]
Kingdoms: Seleucid empire, Ptolemaic kingdom (Egypt), Rome (Republic and Empire)
Date and chronology derivation
Ranges are computed by the project's deterministic chronology engine from the biblical statements and each model's reign anchors. They are reconstructions, not independent dates.
168 BC
Model-independent (applies under every chronology model) · precision: year
How this range was derived
Earliest bound
What else was happening? (model-independent)
- Daniel's refusal of the king's food and the ten-day test (Dan 1:8–16): 606 BC – ?
- Nebuchadnezzar's golden image on the plain of Dura (Dan 3:1–7): 603 BC – ?
- Nebuchadnezzar's decree honouring the God of the three Judeans (Dan 3:28–30): 603 BC – ?
- The refusal of Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego and the fiery furnace (Dan 3:8–27): 603 BC – ?
- The thirty-day decree and Daniel in the lions' den (Dan 6:4–23): 539 BC – ?
- Darius appoints 120 satraps and three chief officials (Dan 6:1–3, 28): 539 BC – ?
- The accusers punished; Darius's decree honouring the God of Daniel (Dan 6:24–27): 539 BC – ?
- Desecration of the Temple: the "abomination of desolation" (15 Chislev 145 SE, 168/167 BC): 168 BC – 166 BC
- Gedaliah governs from Mizpah and is assassinated (2 Kgs 25:22–26): 589 BC – ?
- Accusations to Ahasuerus and the Rehum–Shimshai letter to Artaxerxes; the city's rebuilding stopped (Ezra 4:6–23): 537 BC – ?
- Jerusalem guarded under Hanani and Hananiah; the registry of the first returnees found (Neh 7:1–5): 446 BC – ?
- Jerusalem repopulated: one in ten by lot (Neh 11): 446 BC – ?
- The priestly and Levitical registers to the days of Jaddua (Neh 12:1–26): 446 BC – ?
- The first "burden" of Zechariah 9–11 (undated oracle collection): 518 BC – ?
- The second "burden" of Zechariah 12–14 (undated oracle collection): 518 BC – ?
- The institution of Purim; Mordecai second to the king (Esth 9:20–10:3): 474 BC – ?
- Antiochus IV Epiphanes (reign): 175 BC – 164 BC
Claims, evidence and classifications
Each claim is classified on its own. A classification describes the evidence for that specific claim, not for the event as a whole.
The Roman envoy Popillius Laenas compelled Antiochus IV to withdraw from Egypt by drawing a circle round him.
Polybius (a contemporary) and Livy (read directly; Livy draws on Polybius for eastern affairs, so the two are not fully independent) agree on the circle and the withdrawal; Jerome's version agrees in substance. Jerome calls the envoy "Marcus"; Driver gives "C. Popillius"; Livy here names only "Popilius" (several Popilii appear in books 44–45).
Supporting
- Popilius drew a circle round Antiochus; after brief hesitation he said he would do all the Romans demanded.[1]Strength: direct·29.27.5–6·Claim checked
- Laenas drew a circle in the sand around Antiochus, who withdrew.[3]Strength: indirect·on 11:29–30·Claim checked
- The Roman envoys met Antiochus at Eleusine, four miles from Alexandria; Popilius drew a line round him with a wand; he replied he would do as the senate directed.[4]Strength: direct·Livy 45.12·Claim checked
Context
- Eleusis, four miles from Alexandria; Livy 45.12.[2]Strength: indirect·p. 181·Claim checked
Research date 2026-10-13
Evidence by type
The same evidence regrouped by kind of source. Each item names the claims it bears on.
Archaeological evidence
None recorded for this event.
Scientific findings
None recorded for this event.
Ancient documents
- Popilius drew a circle round Antiochus; after brief hesitation he said he would do all the Romans demanded.[1]Bears on: supporting — “The Roman envoy Popillius Laenas compelled Antiochus IV to withdraw fr…”
- Laenas drew a circle in the sand around Antiochus, who withdrew.[3]Bears on: supporting — “The Roman envoy Popillius Laenas compelled Antiochus IV to withdraw fr…”
- The Roman envoys met Antiochus at Eleusine, four miles from Alexandria; Popilius drew a line round him with a wand; he replied he would do as the senate directed.[4]Bears on: supporting — “The Roman envoy Popillius Laenas compelled Antiochus IV to withdraw fr…”
Modern news and announcements
None recorded for this event.
Reference works and summaries
- Eleusis, four miles from Alexandria; Livy 45.12.[2]Bears on: context — “The Roman envoy Popillius Laenas compelled Antiochus IV to withdraw fr…”
Related passages and events
None recorded.
Prophetic relationships
No prophecy or proposed-fulfillment relationships have been recorded for this event.
Synchronisms with external chronology
Popillius Laenas at Eleusis, 168 BC
Documentary correlation · direct · evidence strength: moderate · independent date: 168 BC (Driver's dating of Polybius and Livy)
The meeting at Eleusis near Alexandria followed Rome's victory over Perseus (Pydna) in 168 BC (Driver).[1, 2]
Assumptions: Livy 45.12 not read directly.
Unanswered questions and research gaps
Research process
2 logged searches
| Date | Query | Where | Useful |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-13 | Polybius 29.27 (LacusCurtius) | web fetch | 1 |
| 2026-10-13 | Driver on 11:29–30 | local text | 1 |
Sources
- 1.Polybius, Paton, W. R. (trans.). Polybius, Histories 29.27 (Loeb VI, 1927) — LacusCurtius. LacusCurtius (Bill Thayer). penelope.uchicago.eduClaim checkedAncient primary textBook 29; the page does not name the translator (Loeb Polybius is Paton's) and says it has not been proofread.Verification log
- 2.Driver, S. R.. The Book of Daniel (Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges). Cambridge University Press. archive.orgClaim checkedScholarly commentaryRead through the Internet Archive OCR text (Google scan).Verification log
- 3.Jerome, Archer, Gleason L. (trans.). Jerome, Commentary on Daniel (trans. Gleason L. Archer, 1958) — chapter 11. tertullian.org (transcribed by Roger Pearse). www.tertullian.orgClaim checkedAncient primary textVerification log
- 4.Livy, McDevitte, William A. (trans.). Livy, History of Rome 37.38–44 and 45.12 (trans. W. A. McDevitte). Project Gutenberg #44318. www.gutenberg.orgClaim checkedAncient primary textVerification log